I wonder how many Americans still Trust and blindly obey their healthcare professionals? I wonder if those healthcare professionals are seeing a drop in people coming in to see them?
You're making a claim and I was excited to see the study so I could share it with people, but the claim made and the study itself say TWO EXACTLY different things. Did you read it? You're saying
" If the article is true and objective then one would think the healthcare professionals people they service would be dropping dead at a higher rate than normal which would then shrink the healthcares patient base eh? "
But why not read the primary source the secondary article is citing to see if it says what it claims to say?
Your claim (or by extension the Article you reposted's claim):
The COVID-19 vaccine catastrophe has reached a horrifying new milestone. A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Preventive Medicine has confirmed what independent researchers, whistleblowers, and grieving families have warned about for years: These experimental injections are maiming and killing people at an unprecedented scale.
Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review, with eleven studies comparing the results between the vaccine group and the unvaccinated group. Additionally, six studies were used for further analysis to compare mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna).
Results:
Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Conclusions:
Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic.
-------------------------------
That above was taken straight from the abstract and conclusion at the beginning of the study, but within it:
Two meta-analyzes examining the relationship between cardiovascular events and COVID-19 vaccination were recently published. A study by Chang et al.,[20] published in 2023, investigated not only myocarditis but also myocardial infarction and arrhythmia. The study found no significant association between COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, which aligns with the findings of our research.
Similarly, Khaity et al.,[21] did not find a significant relationship between arrhythmia and the vaccine.
The assessment of myocardial infarction risk post-COVID-19 vaccination was also examined in a systematic review conducted by Petrudi et al. Their analysis of case report studies concluded that instances of myocardial infarction after COVID-19 vaccination are infrequent.[32] Likewise, the analysis by Baqi et al., which scrutinized 10 case reports and 5 case series studies, underscored that myocardial infarction associated with COVID-19 vaccination is an uncommon yet severe and potentially life-threatening occurrence.[33]
--------------------------------
It's straight up misinformation like this that makes us all look stupid, isn't it? The study supports none of the claims in the article. Why not read the primary source before you cut and paste stuff from elsewhere that gives all of us that had concerns about the vaccines a bad name?
I'm just saying. Not an attack on you, but maybe vet the articles you pass around better so you don't get caught in the trap of spreading fake news.
So first, I didn’t produce the study nor the article that referenced it.
Second I’ve read enough things that I formed my own opinion about the likelihood of the studies being shared as being manipulated somehow, and I didn’t need Any of these studies to know that when the FED GOV is giving out ANYTHING for FREE, the THINKING person will refuse whatever it is because the FED GOV ONLY ever takes.
It NEVER volunteers to give unless what it GETS back for what it gives is more desired than the thing given.
So while you want to nitpick the article I put up, I put it up exactly so people could go do their OWN research and come to their OWN conclusions about taking the mRNA injections or not.
If you want to pretend its my fault the article is conflicting in its assertions based on a study it quoted or that this somehow makes me look stupid, is just fucking retarded. If you want to do that, just unsubscribe and stop reading what I post. The only person coming off stupid in this comment is the one presuming I should do all the work so you don’t have to do any.
Wow, you're really one of the dumbest people alive aren't you? Obviously you didn't produce the study or you would have known that you ignorantly shared an article that said basically 100% opposite of what the study said. Have you even once considered that some of those sources purposely lie to you and that you should do due dilligence before spreading their lies and making the whole resistance to vaccine movement look like retarded people, like you did by sharing a fabrication? It's not nit-picking, you 100% shared a load of horse shit with people and you should take better care to ensure that which you send out has some veracity to it rather than complete hog wash. No one is presuming anything, you numb skull. I did the work, and looked at the referenced article and found that it was full of horse shit, like you have been rationalizing you making yourself to look out like a donkey.
Do better, or stay in dumb founded state and continue making dumb ass mistakes like this. Get some help, you need it.
Circus maximus is the same clown ABT4. This idiots to stupid to move along.
You might want to find someone else to nag clown. Like I care what ur dumbass thinks. ;)
At least I'm not stupid enough to go harass someone who doesn't give a shit what you think. Waaaaaah Cry some more you silly little bitch!
You're making a claim and I was excited to see the study so I could share it with people, but the claim made and the study itself say TWO EXACTLY different things. Did you read it? You're saying
" If the article is true and objective then one would think the healthcare professionals people they service would be dropping dead at a higher rate than normal which would then shrink the healthcares patient base eh? "
But why not read the primary source the secondary article is citing to see if it says what it claims to say?
Your claim (or by extension the Article you reposted's claim):
The COVID-19 vaccine catastrophe has reached a horrifying new milestone. A peer-reviewed study published in the International Journal of Preventive Medicine has confirmed what independent researchers, whistleblowers, and grieving families have warned about for years: These experimental injections are maiming and killing people at an unprecedented scale.
Here's the study in your article:
https://journals.lww.com/ijom/fulltext/2025/03210/covid_19_vaccination_and_cardiovascular_events__a.6.aspx?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
Here's the conclusion:
Methods:
Fifteen studies were included in the systematic review, with eleven studies comparing the results between the vaccine group and the unvaccinated group. Additionally, six studies were used for further analysis to compare mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines (Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna).
Results:
Bayesian meta-analysis revealed a link between vaccines and CAD risk (OR, 1.70; 95% CrI: 1.11–2.57), particularly after BNT162b2 (OR, 1.64; 95% CrI: 1.06–2.55) and second dose (OR, 3.44; 95% CrI: 1.99–5.98). No increased risk of heart attack, arrhythmia, or stroke was observed post-COVID-19 vaccination. As the only noteworthy point, a protective effect on stroke (OR, 0.19; 95% CrI: 0.10–0.39) and myocardial infarction (OR, 0.003; 95% CrI: 0.001–0.006) was observed after the third dose of the vaccine.
Conclusions:
Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic.
-------------------------------
That above was taken straight from the abstract and conclusion at the beginning of the study, but within it:
Two meta-analyzes examining the relationship between cardiovascular events and COVID-19 vaccination were recently published. A study by Chang et al.,[20] published in 2023, investigated not only myocarditis but also myocardial infarction and arrhythmia. The study found no significant association between COVID-19 vaccination and the incidence of myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, which aligns with the findings of our research.
Similarly, Khaity et al.,[21] did not find a significant relationship between arrhythmia and the vaccine.
The assessment of myocardial infarction risk post-COVID-19 vaccination was also examined in a systematic review conducted by Petrudi et al. Their analysis of case report studies concluded that instances of myocardial infarction after COVID-19 vaccination are infrequent.[32] Likewise, the analysis by Baqi et al., which scrutinized 10 case reports and 5 case series studies, underscored that myocardial infarction associated with COVID-19 vaccination is an uncommon yet severe and potentially life-threatening occurrence.[33]
--------------------------------
It's straight up misinformation like this that makes us all look stupid, isn't it? The study supports none of the claims in the article. Why not read the primary source before you cut and paste stuff from elsewhere that gives all of us that had concerns about the vaccines a bad name?
I'm just saying. Not an attack on you, but maybe vet the articles you pass around better so you don't get caught in the trap of spreading fake news.
So first, I didn’t produce the study nor the article that referenced it.
Second I’ve read enough things that I formed my own opinion about the likelihood of the studies being shared as being manipulated somehow, and I didn’t need Any of these studies to know that when the FED GOV is giving out ANYTHING for FREE, the THINKING person will refuse whatever it is because the FED GOV ONLY ever takes.
It NEVER volunteers to give unless what it GETS back for what it gives is more desired than the thing given.
So while you want to nitpick the article I put up, I put it up exactly so people could go do their OWN research and come to their OWN conclusions about taking the mRNA injections or not.
If you want to pretend its my fault the article is conflicting in its assertions based on a study it quoted or that this somehow makes me look stupid, is just fucking retarded. If you want to do that, just unsubscribe and stop reading what I post. The only person coming off stupid in this comment is the one presuming I should do all the work so you don’t have to do any.
Wow, you're really one of the dumbest people alive aren't you? Obviously you didn't produce the study or you would have known that you ignorantly shared an article that said basically 100% opposite of what the study said. Have you even once considered that some of those sources purposely lie to you and that you should do due dilligence before spreading their lies and making the whole resistance to vaccine movement look like retarded people, like you did by sharing a fabrication? It's not nit-picking, you 100% shared a load of horse shit with people and you should take better care to ensure that which you send out has some veracity to it rather than complete hog wash. No one is presuming anything, you numb skull. I did the work, and looked at the referenced article and found that it was full of horse shit, like you have been rationalizing you making yourself to look out like a donkey.
Do better, or stay in dumb founded state and continue making dumb ass mistakes like this. Get some help, you need it.